Is intelligent alien life darting around in space — and even in the skies above us here on Earth? Has the U.S. Government is covering up unexplained phenomena, and using secret extraterrestrial discoveries to boost its own technology?
The idea of humanity encountering advanced, non-human technology has long been a subject of fascination. From science fiction movies to conspiracy theories whispered in hushed tones, the concept of alien life forms and their possible influence on Earth has always lingered on the fringes of mainstream discussion. But what happens when experts with decades of government, military, and scientific experience step forward to suggest that these ideas might not be as far-fetched as we think?
On November 13, 2024, four such experts testified before the U.S. House Oversight Committee, sharing accounts and evidence that could reshape our understanding of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs). Their statements weren’t the speculative musings of hobbyists but deeply unsettling testimonies that hinted at advanced technologies beyond human comprehension—and possibly beyond human creation.
Video source: https://www.youtube.com/@oversightandaccountability;
Four experts testified in Wednesday's public hearing. You can watch the proceeding here.
Let’s break down the Testimonies.
Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet is not the type to make wild claims. A decorated naval officer and respected scientist, his words carry weight. So when he recounted a 2015 incident involving an F/A-18 jet and a mysterious object off the U.S. East Coast, people listened. Known as the "Go Fast" video, the footage captured a fast-moving object that seemed to defy the known laws of aerodynamics.
What made this story even more chilling wasn’t just the footage but what happened afterward. Gallaudet testified that an email containing the video—sent to him and other recipients—disappeared from their inboxes the very next day. Coincidence? Perhaps. But in Gallaudet’s own words, “The timing raises more questions than it answers.”
This wasn’t just about a strange object in the sky. It was about the suppression of evidence, a possibility that lends credence to long-standing theories of governmental secrecy surrounding UAPs.
You can read his written testimony here.
Gallaudet’s testimony painted a picture of a world where information could vanish as quickly as the phenomena themselves.
If Gallaudet’s account raised eyebrows, Luis Elizondo’s statements blew the roof off. As the former head of the Pentagon's Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), Elizondo is no stranger to the world of UAP investigations. His testimony wasn’t just eye-opening; it was downright unsettling.
Elizondo made a bold claim: some UAPs are “not of any known human origin.” These objects, he argued, demonstrate flight capabilities that are not only advanced but completely beyond the realm of human engineering. Imagine crafts that can accelerate instantaneously, change direction at impossible speeds, and operate with no visible propulsion systems. That’s what Elizondo says we’re dealing with.
But the implications don’t stop there. Elizondo alleged that nations around the world are engaged in a covert arms race to reverse-engineer these technologies. This isn’t just a scientific curiosity; it’s a matter of national security. “Misallocated taxpayer dollars,” he called it—a sobering reminder of how secrecy can come at the expense of public trust.
You can read his written testimony here
Elizondo’s testimony forces us to confront an uncomfortable question: If these technologies aren’t ours, then whose are they?
Michael Gold’s testimony took a slightly different approach. As a former NASA official and a member of NASA’s UAP Independent Study Team, Gold focused on the cultural and institutional barriers that prevent meaningful discussions about UAPs.
“The stigma surrounding UAPs is one of the greatest obstacles to understanding them,” Gold stated. And he’s right. For decades, the topic of UFOs and UAPs has been relegated to the realm of conspiracy theories and tabloid headlines. Serious scientists and policymakers have been hesitant to engage, fearing ridicule or professional backlash.
Gold argued that this needs to change. He called for greater collaboration between government agencies, academia, and private research organizations. “To understand the unexplained, we must first be willing to talk about it,” he said. It’s a simple yet profound message: How can we hope to uncover the truth if we’re too afraid to ask the questions?
Gold’s testimony wasn’t just a call for transparency; it was a call for courage. The courage to face the unknown and to do so with open minds and rigorous scientific inquiry.
Journalist Michael Shellenberger brought a different kind of evidence to the table: history. His 214-page document, presented to the committee, is a comprehensive timeline of UAP sightings and incidents spanning from 1947 to 2023. From the infamous Roswell crash to more recent military encounters, Shellenberger’s dossier connects the dots in a way that’s hard to ignore.
But Shellenberger didn’t stop at recounting history. He came with a demand: transparency. He urged Congress to pass legislation that would require the disclosure of UAP-related activities and funding. “The public deserves to know,” he argued, echoing the sentiments of many who have long suspected that the truth about UAPs is being withheld.
You can his wriiten testimony here.
Shellenberger’s testimony also highlighted the broader implications of secrecy. “UAP transparency is bi-partisan and critical to our national security,” he said. In an era where misinformation and distrust run rampant, openness about UAPs could be a small but significant step toward restoring public faith in government institutions.
So, what do we make of all this? Four experts, each with unique perspectives, converged on one undeniable truth: UAPs are real, and they demand our attention. But beyond that, their testimonies raise questions that go to the heart of our understanding of the world.
Are we truly alone in the universe? If not, what are the implications of encountering advanced technologies from unknown origins? And perhaps most importantly, why has so much of this been shrouded in secrecy for so long?
The answers to these questions could redefine our place in the cosmos. But for now, they remain tantalizingly out of reach.
The testimonies also highlight the stakes involved. If Elizondo is correct, and nations are indeed racing to reverse-engineer UAP technologies, then we’re not just talking about scientific curiosity. We’re talking about a potential shift in global power dynamics. Imagine the country that unlocks these technologies first—it could have capabilities that render current military and economic systems obsolete.
On the flip side, the secrecy surrounding UAPs comes with its own risks. Misallocated funding, lack of oversight, and public distrust are just the tip of the iceberg. As Shellenberger pointed out, transparency isn’t just a moral imperative; it’s a practical necessity.
In 1977, President Carter asked NASA to look into resuming UFO investigations, but the agency and the Air Force believed "nothing would be gained by further investigation."
But in recent years, there have been increased efforts to compile and centralize the reporting of unexplained phenomena.
In July 2022, the U.S. government established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, to standardize reporting methods and data collection. It collects UAP reports from the military and from the Federal Aviation Administration including sightings reported by civilian pilots to air traffic control. The agency doesn't offer a way for the general public to file a UAP report. It does accept "reports from current or former U.S. Government employees, service members, or contractor personnel with direct knowledge of U.S. Government programs or activities related to UAP dating back to 1945."
The agency adds that potential filers should not submit "any information that is potentially CLASSIFIED, or unclassified information that is not publicly releasable (e.g. subject to export control regulations)."
Because of intense public interest, a number of records related to UFO studies are available online, including a "case files" folder related to UAPs on the U.S. Navy's website. The FBI also has an online "vault" of records, covering the period from 1947 to 1954.
As for the famous Project Blue Book run by the U.S. Air Force from 1947 through 1969, documents related to the project are now kept by the National Archives, which holds 37 cubic feet of case files, along with at least 5 other cubic feet of records.
So, where do we go from here? The ball is now in Congress’s court. Will lawmakers act on these testimonies and push for greater transparency? Or will these revelations be buried under the weight of bureaucracy and political infighting?
For now, all we can do is watch, wait, and stay curious. The truth might be out there, but it’s up to us to demand it.
One thing is certain: the conversation about UAPs has shifted. What was once a fringe topic is now a matter of public and governmental interest. And as more information comes to light, we may find that the answers we seek are closer than we think—or perhaps further away than we can imagine.